The psychological approach to the teaching and learning of mathematics in early childhood education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.595Palavras-chave:
Mathematics education, primary education, psychological approachResumo
The present work aims to determine the importance that teachers give to the precepts of psychological approaches in the process of teaching and learning Mathematics in children of primary education, of a Public Educational Institution in the city of Guayaquil, province of Guayas, Ecuador. The methodology is descriptive, with a field design. The population under study was made up of twenty-five teachers (25) of the primary education stage. The information was collected through an interview and through a Likert scale questionnaire. The instrument was validated through expert judgment and reliability through the Alpha Cronbach coefficient. A quantitative analysis of the data was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: regarding the starting diagnosis; 36% always indicated; on the realization of the planning based on the postulates of the theories that exist on the teaching-learning process; 44% said always; Regarding activities for the strategic development of logical or operational thinking in the child, 60% always said; Regarding the use of recreational activities as a strategy for teaching and learning mathematics in primary school children, 80% always stated that psychological approaches favor the teaching and learning of mathematics in primary school children in a world in constant transformation, 0% always responded. In short, it is evident that the intention of the study of Mathematics from childhood must be aimed at providing the student with a positive vision of this science, in such a way that they acquire the skills of abstraction, logic and critical thinking, with the necessary support of psychological approaches for the adequate teaching and learning of mathematics in children of primary education.
Referências
Beltrán, M., & Torres, N. (2009). Characterization of critical thinking skills in high school students through the HCTAES test. Next area. Revista del Instituto de Estudios en Educación Universidad del Norte, No. 11, pp.66-85.
Bisquerra, R. (2016). Methodology of educational research. Madrid: La Muralla.
Bravo, L. (2016). Learning mathematics: Cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Research Journal (Arequipa). Electronic version ISSN 2309-6691. Volume 7. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Luis-Bravo-4/publication/313694592_-Neurociencias_Matematicas11/links/58a3186f45851513c5fddf19/Neurociencias-Matematicas11.pdf, pp.11-29.
Knight, E. (2022). Playful activities to learn mathematics. Pol. Con. (Issue No. 70); Vol 7, No 10. DOI: 10.23857/pc.v7i8, pp. 1571-1593.
Castro, E., del Olmo, M., & Castro, E. (2002). Development of Child Mathematical Thinking. Granada, Spain: University of Granada. ISBN: 84-932510-3-8. pp.119. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/143615113.pdf.
Cobeña, J., & Yánez, M. (2022). The diagnostic evaluation and its influence on the teaching-learning process in students of basic general education. Pole of Knowledge (Issue No. 71) Vol. 7, No 6. DOI: 10.23857/pc.v7i6.4149, pp. 1498-1513.
Del Prado, N. (2017). Mathematics and Psychology in harmonious interaction. http://www.cubadebate.cu/opinion/2017/06/07/la-matematica-y-la-psicologia-en-interaccion-armoniosa/.
Delgado, J. (2002). The teaching of Mathematics from a Vigotskian perspective. Conference: Latin American Meeting of Educational Mathematics; Volume, 16. Havana, Cuba. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261699400_La_ensenanza_de_la_Matematica_desde_una_optica_vigotskiana .
Flores, P. (2001). Learning in Mathematics. https://www.ugr.es/~pflores/textos/cLASES/CAP/APRENDI.pdf, pp.1-9.
Garzón, J., Rojas, O., Cañizares, L., & Culqui, C. (2019). The impact of psychology in education. RECIMUNDO; Vol. 3 No. 2. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/3. (2).April.2019.543-565. https://www.recimundo.com/index.php/es/article/view/463, pp.543-565.
Godino, J. (2010). Perspective of the Didactics of Mathematics as a Techno-scientific Discipline. University of Granada, Spain. https://www.ugr.es/~jgodino/fundamentos_teoricos/perspectiva_ddm.pdf, pp.57.
Guevara, G., Verdesoto, A., & Castro, N. (2020). Educational research methodologies (descriptive, experimental, participatory, and action research). RECIMUNDO;4 (3). DOI: 10.26820/recimundo/4. (3).July.2020.163-173, pp.163-173.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Research methodology. Mexico: McGraw-Hill. 6th edition.
Lasprilla, A. (2021). Analysis of the vectors of community ethics in a teaching-learning activity of mathematics. La matematica e la sua didattica; Anno 29, No. 2, https://rsddm.dm.unibo.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2-A-Lasprilla-Herrera-MD-292-2021.pdf, pp.123–143.
Lebrija, A. (2017). Training model for research teachers. Panama: UDELAS.
Marinova, N. (2021). The Teaching of Mathematics in Primary Education. A Study of the Classrooms of Segovia. University of Valladolid. Final Degree Project. https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/handle/10324/45439/TFG-B.%201570.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y , pp.68.
Meece, J. (2000). Child and adolescent development. Compendium for educators, SEP. https://www.guao.org/sites/default/files/portafolio%20docente/Teor%C3%ADa%20del%20desarrollo%20de%20Piaget.pdf, pp. 101-127.
Ministry of Education of Ecuador. (2019). Curriculum of Compulsory Education Levels. Medium Sublevel. Ministry of Education of Ecuador. Second Edition. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2019/09/EGB-Media.pdf, pp.528.
Miranda, I., & Gómez, A. (2018). The teaching of mathematics with the approach of the Theory of Communities of Practice. Mathematics Education , vol. 30, no. 3, doi: 10.24844/EM3003.11. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/edumat/v30n3/1665-5826-ed-30-03-277.pdf, pp.277-296 .
Moncada, A. (2016). The diagnostic evaluation and its impact on the development of the skills of three-year-old girls and boys of the basic education school No. 26 Monsignor Leonidas Proaño, school period 2016-2017. Guayaquil, Ecuador. http://repositorio.ulvr.edu.ec/handle/44000/1554.
Moreno Sánchez, M. ., Angulo Quiñonez, K. ., & Prado Cruel, H. . (2022). Digital skills for teaching mathematics in higher education. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v3i2.367
Muñoz, A. (2010). Developmental psychology in the primary education stage. Madrid: Pyramid.
Ramirez, G. (2021). Family and play as a distance learning strategy during the Covid-19 pandemic in Mexico: A proposal from university teaching in health sciences. Journal of Distance Education (RED), 21(65). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.456231. https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/456231.
Ramírez, J., & López, J. (2018). Psychoeducational intervention for mathematics in special education: towards a model proposal. International Journal of Educational Research and Training. https://www.ensj.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/02-Intervenci%C3%B3n-psicoeducativa-para-las-matem%C3%A1ticas.pdf, pp.1-17.
Ramirez, T. (1999). How to do a research project. Caracas: Panapo. (1st. ed.).
Rivas, P. (2008). Mathematics education in the critical range of schooling and the curriculum of basic education. Educere; Vol.12. No.40. Meridahttp://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1316-49102008000100019.
Rodriguez, M. (2010). Mathematics: key science in the integral development of initial education students. Next Zone: Journal of the Institute of Studies in Education Universidad del Norte. Barranquilla, Colombia; No. 13. ISSN 1657-2416. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/853/85317326009.pdf , pp. 130-141.
Rojas, F., & Farías, D. (2015). From the Stage of Concrete Operations to Formal Operations in the Teaching of Mathematics. Research and Postgraduate; Vol. 30(2), Caracas. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1316-00872015000200004, pp. 57-75.
Ruiz, Y. (2011). Learning Mathematics. Digital magazine for teaching professionals. Federación de enseñanza de CC.OO de Andalucía, Nro.14. ISNN: 1989-4023. https://www.feandalucia.ccoo.es/docu/p5sd8451.pdf, pp.1-8.
Sarmiento, M. (2007). The Teaching of Mathematics and ICTs. A Lifelong Learning Strategy. Chapter 2. Teaching and Learning. Universitat Rovira I Virgili. ISBN: 978-84-690-8294-2 / D.L: T.1625-2007. https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/8927/D-TESIS_CAPITULO_2.pdf, pp.145.
Suástegui, S., & Gell, A. (2022). The development of logical thinking from the numerical: a pedagogical vision. Male. Scientific Methodological Journal; No.75, Havana, Cuba. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1992-82382022000200016.
Tamayo, & Tamayo, M. (2012). The Process of Scientific Research. Mexico: Limusa. 5th edition.
Tobias, A. (2022). The stage of concrete operations of Piaget's development. https://lamenteesmaravillosa.com/la-etapa-de-las-operaciones-concretas-del-desarrollo-de-piaget/.
Valdes, A. (2014). Stages of Piaget's cognitive development. Marist University of Guadalajara.Jalisco, Mexico. PhD in Psychology-Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327219515_Etapas_del_desarrollo_cognitivo_de_Piaget.
Vielma, E., & Salas, M. (2000). Contributions of the Theories of Vygotsky, Piaget, Bandura and Bruner Parallelism in their Positions in Relation to Development. EDUCERE, Articles, Year 3, No. 9, http://www.saber.ula.ve/bitstream/handle/123456789/19513/articulo5-4-9.pdf;jsessionid=73C966B5D4423A2D89C67849C81A35AB?sequence=1, pp.30-37.
Vygotsky, L. (1979). The development of higher psychic processes. Barcelona, Spain: Grijalbo.
Wittrock, M. (1974). The hypothesis of learning by discovery. In Shulman L. and Keislar E. (Comps.): Learning by discovery. Critical evaluation. Mexico: Trillas, pp.47-94.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Maira Mariana Ruiz-Chila, Walter Eduardo Pimentel-Estupiñán, Karen Tatiana Ontaneda-Albán, Martha Margarita Cedeño-Mera, Nuris Yadira Cheme-Cotera
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.